In a recent interview with The Sun, the Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has addressed the controversies surrounding his removal by the previous administration and his subsequent reinstatement by the current government. Emir Sanusi discussed a range of topics, shedding light on his tenure and the challenges he faced, as well as providing insights into the history and significance of the Kano Emirate and the role of traditional institutions in Nigeria.
Emir Sanusi revealed that his removal from office by the past government was a complex matter, explaining that his unpopularity stemmed from his outspoken nature and his commitment to reforms. He emphasized that his stance on various social and economic issues often put him at odds with the political establishment. Despite the contentious circumstances, he did not challenge his removal in court, citing several reasons for his decision.
Sanusi elaborated on his belief that being an Emir is not a fundamental right but rather a responsibility bestowed upon him by God. He mentioned that, as one of many princes, his selection as Emir was a divine choice, and if God willed his removal, it was for a reason beyond his understanding. He also pointed out that the process of his removal was marked by a lack of due process, as he was not given specific details or an opportunity to defend himself against the charges of insubordination.
Reflecting on the broader implications, Emir Sanusi discussed the role of traditional institutions in Nigeria, emphasizing their importance in maintaining cultural heritage and social stability. He expressed hope that his experiences would serve as a lesson for future leaders and highlighted the need for respecting traditional roles while fostering dialogue and understanding between traditional rulers and political authorities.
He said: A number of reasons. I have told you that I don’t have a fundamental right to be an Emir. I am one of hundreds of princes. God chose me. And if God says I should leave, for me, I take it that God knows better than me why I had to leave. Okay, let’s say I go to court. Let me even say this; I just got a letter that said I had been dethroned for insubordination. I had never been queried for insubordination. The details of the insubordination were not given. I had not been given any chance to defend myself. So, it was clear that the state and the federal governments had both decided that it was time for me to go. Okay?……..See More
Check Out The Top 5 Most Brutal Military Training Around The World